What does everyone think about web fonts vs system fonts?
Inspired by articles like "Web fonts: when you need them, when you don’t" (https://hackernoon.com/web-fonts-when-you-need-them-when-you-dont-a3b4b39fe0ae) I've tended to use system fonts on most of the pages I've built.
But lately I've been wondering if I should embrace web fonts—in part because my own #Arch install doesn't have many of the fonts in my system font stack
What do y'all tend to do?
@codesections I use web fonts *but* serve them from my site. (I am too OCD about how the fonts look on my site.)
Also I don't serve 100% of the web font character set; I **subset** all the fonts.
So while I load 10 different fonts, they are "only" about 130KB (small price to pay to make things look as I want) of my 191KB home page. But still as I have properly hand-crafted my site, it loads in under a second.
Very interesting! I think I'll stick with my ~4kb site, but it's nice to see another prospective.
(Also, comparing our sites, I sense a bit of a vim/emacs divide)
> .. I sense a bit of a vim/emacs divide
Heh, a "bit"? :).
Jokes aside, I respect folks who know how to use their lives editors, be it vim and emacs (I say so because I know folks who use vim, but always live in insert mode, and copy/paste using mouse and Gvim menu bar).
Your website is a great example of minimalism, while not throwing away all the goodies (good presentation, nice minimal CSS, etc.)
This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!
We adhere to an adapted version of the TootCat Code of Conduct and follow the Toot Café list of blocked instances. Ash is the admin and is supported by Fuzzface, Brian!, and Daniel Glus as moderators.
Hosting costs are largely covered by our generous supporters on Patreon – thanks for all the help!