if gitlab really is going to save 25% by deleting "dormant" repos, they need to fire the people that went with expensive disk to host it, and then find someone that will charge less money

hell, even offer cold storage or near-line storage for these "dormant" projects instead of obliterating them from the internet

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon for Tech Folks

This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!