Not sure I get the rationale behind Kotlin’s primary constructor. It seems like it’s like the designated initializer, but it can’t contain code? That last restriction flummoxes me. WHY?

@uliwitness I don't know much about Kotlin, but I guess it's assumed that you won't need anything specific other than members initialization most of the time, so it's more «concise» without anything in the class «block».

I guess it's more a «type definition + optional init code execution» than a «constructor»

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon for Tech Folks

This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either! We adhere to an adapted version of the TootCat Code of Conduct and have documented a list of blocked instances. Ash is the admin and is supported by Fuzzface, Brian!, and Daniel Glus as moderators. Hosting costs are largely covered by our generous supporters on Patreon – thanks for all the help!