correction : It is strictly prohibited by and ; but unclear whether it applies to sub-domains as well *in the case of *.

Show thread

I know of the GitLab instance that is at gitlab.gnome.org which is a violation.

Did @gnome obtain any special permissions to use the sub-domain?

I hope that the policy was not overlooked. There should have been some sort of dialogue between the organizations and some arrangement that was reached after deliberation.

Show thread

If you have a personal blog at wordpress.name.tld or a self-hosted gitlab instance at gitlab.name.tld, that is technically violating trademark rules.

I don't think it is strictly enforced though because there aren't any services ( that I know of at least ) that have gathered more popularity ( with misdirection in their domain names ) than the original services.

Show thread

you can't have 'gitlab', 'wordpress' or 'ghost' in top-level domain names because they are protected trademarks.

It is strictly prohibited by and ; but unclear whether it applies to sub-domains as well.

sources :
- GitLab : about.gitlab.com/handbook/mark
- WordPress : wordpressfoundation.org/tradem
- Ghost : ghost.org/trademark/ > Automatic Restriction.

shine boosted
shine boosted

Don't be shy with DNS TTLs.

If you have settled your services on one or more IP addresses, push the TTL up. 12-24 hours are no problem. You mitigate almost all service outages from your DNS providers by that.

Main thing you have to keep in mind is that if you want to move a service around, you can either move the IP address with your service or should to lower the TTL at least 12 hours before moving the service.

#DNS #TTL #admin

shine boosted

@DesCoutinho @praveen 2. Free Software is accountable and without accountability and the option to run a service on our own (a.k.a self-hosting which allows decentralization), we can't simply ensure privacy protection. Closed and centralized services like Facebook, Whatsapp, Twitter, etc. pose a huge threat to our privacy as well as free speech. That's the price we've to pay for our 'convenience' in using their free-of-cost 'services'.

shine boosted

@DesCoutinho This is the simplified version (copied from gnu.org): “Free software” means software that respects users' freedom and community. Roughly, it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. Thus, “free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer”.

If you have any doubts, I'll try to answer them according to my knowledge.

shine boosted

@DesCoutinho Free radicals, nice pun! 😄

BTW software freedom isn't that complex to understand neither it requires knowledge of software engineering. It's basically about four freedoms: Freedom to run the software for any purpose, freedom to study how the software works, freedom to share the software with anyone, freedom to share the modified version of the software.

'Free' in Free Software stands for Freedom!

For more details: gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.htm

shine boosted

"Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say."
— Edward Snowden

Similarly, the argument that you don't care about software freedom because you don't know coding can be considered as same. It's like arguing that you don't care about the food you eat because you don't know cooking!

#FreeSoftware #SoftwareFreedom

shine boosted

@sir @wolf480pl I like both the question and the answer. Areas of trust will never be static and will change. Trust-no-one is an ideal. Trust, but verify. Ask, answer, evaluate. Repeat.

shine boosted

It's important to think about trust and reliability transitively. For example, if you choose to use GitLab, you have to also acknowledge that you're choosing CloudFlare and Google Cloud Platform. CloudFlare is having problems today, therefore GitLab is having problems today. Shouldn't come as a surprise.

Full disclosure for sr.ht: you are transitively relying on Twilio to wake me up during off-hours if something goes wrong. Other than that, there are no third-party infrastructure dependencies on sr.ht like CloudFlare which could trigger issues; we colocate all of our servers and manage our own network. And that also leave us in a position to address any problems ourselves, without having to twiddle our thumbs and wait for a third-party to figure their shit out.

shine boosted

When CloudFlare has an outage this @bofh_excuses is a valid excuse.

shine boosted

#BOFH excuse #435:

Internet shut down due to maintenance

shine boosted
New Blog Post: Why IRC is Still Good in $CURRENT_YEAR

https://www.paritybit.ca/blog/why-irc-is-still-good

"IRC is often disparaged for being outdated but it is still a great and useful chat platform. Let me tell you why."

#100DaysToOffload
shine boosted

By the way, thanks to the help of @nathand I was able to reproduce the issue earlier today.

I can official say that one shouldn't use the implementation of canarymail for OpenPGP, because it's unaware of how to select the right key. They not only are unable to select the encryption sub key, but also ignore expiry dates and key revocation, making it an actual danger.

#infosec #MacOS #canarymail #OpenPGP #security #email

Show thread
shine boosted

We need to defeat this bizzare cognative dissonance people face when they have to re-evaluate the place email holds in their mind. It's not some useless relic of the last generation to cast off in the course of chasing the shiny new.

Email:

- Federated
- Decentralized
- Built with open standards
- Fault tolerant
- Enjoys a wide variety of open-source clients & servers
- Has widely available implementations for almost every programming language
- Already being used for software development at scales greater than GitHub-style development has ever dreamed of

"Email? Yuck"

Screw that noise. Set aside your preconceptions and look at email for what it is. The things that make you "yuck" about email are more related to the bastardization of email *software* by corporate interests like Google and Microsoft, and have next to nothing to do with email itself.

shine boosted

@nolan I think any effort towards killing electron with fire is a good thing. In the mobile space the vast majority of apps seem to be little more than custom containers for web content made to deliberately circumvent security, privacy and user control. Electron seems almost deliberately designed to bring that evil practise to the desktop.

My main concern is that the big G seems to be the only significant player in desktop PWA and they shouldn't be trusted with setting standards by themselves.

shine boosted

@dch Sure, you can also use Lynx to browse the web, your terminal to send emails, etc. Healthy limits. 🙂

The other thing to be aware of is that browsers are smart about reducing bloat in tabs. They suspend/throttle background tabs, share memory wherever possible (e.g. across same-origins), etc. I'd still rather have 10 webapps open in 10 browser tabs than 10 Electron apps.

shine boosted

Some people prefer the Electron versions of apps because they like being able to press Alt-Tab instead of having to pin a browser tab. Or they like that it's better integrated into the system notifications. For me, this is a bad reason to compromise so much security (and performance as well – you're running a whole extra instance of Chromium).

Show thread
Show more
Mastodon for Tech Folks

This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!