Oh, my piece for the Institute of Network Cultures got published and I missed it!
Fighting Disinformation: We’re Solving The Wrong Problems
> The reason why misinformation and disinformation spread so fast is that our most commonly used communication tools had been built in a way that promotes that kind of content over fact-checked, long-form, nuanced reporting.
> One could call this the “outrage dividend“, and disinformation benefits especially handsomely from it.
@nemobis I did not, but I might, thank you for the link. In return: did you read my piece, or just the excerpts I tooted here?
I do not have any hard evidence, as my piece is an opinion piece and not a scientific paper. You are more then welcome to dismiss it on this basis entirely and move on with your life. 🤷♀️
But the article you link to also does not seem to disagree with what I wrote. If it does, please point to where.
@nemobis one more thing: the outrage dividend exists even if only as the well-documented spread bump that "angry-emoji" posts used to get (and perhaps still get) on Facebook, compared to all other posts. This was documented by Washington Post:
Of course I define it considerably wider, but if we want to nit-pick, there you have it: an actual proof it existed in a very specific way.
mastodon.technology is shutting down by the end of 2022. Please migrate your data immediately. This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!