@ilja "the purpose of a system is what it does", as a wise old man once said.
Bitcoin uses energy to mint cryptoassets.
There is, in fact, a specific amount of energy that can be said was used to mint each BTC ever minted, as we have info on exact time and date it got minted, *and* a record of the historical hash rate.
That's one of the many ways to slice this cake, of course, but it is still a valid one.
@rysiek so crypto-wallets will go the same way as facebook: More profiles for the dead that ones that are alive.
@rysiek They forgot the core requirement of distributed systems: Getting rid of things.
It’s one of the things that Freenet got right from the beginning: What’s not accessed disappears (and yields its resources to things that are used).
@rysiek The value has not disappeared. It has been distributed to the remaining accessible bitcoin. Much like how printing dollars doesn’t create value, it simply reduces the value of every existing dollar.
@mike that's one way of looking at it.
But dollars can be printed whenever we want, and with negligible marginal cost. Minting a single bitcoin takes *loads* of energy, and the supply is capped.
At some point this system will inevitably end up in a state where most assets are lost.
@rysiek I’m not following here. The assets are lost, but the value is not. The assets are also infinitely divisible, so it does not matter if we lose 90% of them, it doesn’t really change anything when the currency is already deflationary by design.
@rysiek What do you think of bitcoin as a waste energy capture medium? You can mine bitcoin anywhere in the world. Many places in the world have an energy generation surplus that, due to limited capacity of energy storage and transmission, simply goes to waste. If a great deal of the energy used to mine bitcoin comes from such sources, it totally changes the meaning the gigawatts spent to mine bitcoin, potentially making it neutral or even good when the number grows.
> If a great deal of the energy used to mine bitcoin comes from such sources
But it doesn't. Instead, Bitcoin is keeping Kazakh coal plants running, after having kept Chinese ones running for years:
There is no world in which Bitcoin this mining makes sense. We must stop making those excuses.
@rysiek Yeah, that sucks. But, why not burn energy that would otherwise be wasted? What’s the downside of that?
@rysiek (by waste energy I mean green energy like tidal and solar that can’t be stored or transmitted)
This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!