Follow

Why the fsck do people make websites like this:
gun.eco/docs/

Scrollbars removed, every interaction (badly) mediated by JavaScript - to a point where links to sub-headings do not work.

A pure HTML site with a tiny bit of CSS would have been much more readable, and much more usable.

Ugh.

· · Web · 8 · 7 · 11

@rysiek the state of the modern web has convinced me, once and for all, that there is no idea so bad that someone won't come along and go "hey, let's give this a go!"

@thamesynne in fact, there is no idea so bad that someone won't come along and sell it to someone for good money as the Next Shiny Thing.

@rysiek New web devs that think Javascript is the savior of the web and not realizing that people did more with less when they were still in diapers.

@claudiom @rysiek that website, is designed to be a mobile-centric webapp; and in my opinion, even on mobile, it is not a good design.

@rysiek That's definitely all they had in mind, and they even failed at that IMO. @jezra

@claudiom @rysiek Is there a war being waged on scroll bars? First the browsers made them tiny and almost unusable and now I guess we're just deleting them altogether?

@swaggboi @claudiom @rysiek i think InfinityScroll made scrollbars vastly unusable (because js figured out when to fetch new content and constantly appending it to the bottom)

<sarcasm>eventually it'll all get much better when everything is finally webasm</sarcasm>

@rysiek @swaggboi @claudiom 🤣

"should i click this link? dear god, please don't let it jizz in my hardware. again"

@ruffni I personally think you should always have a fallback. 🤷‍♂️ @swaggboi @rysiek

@claudiom @ruffni @swaggboi as a general rule:
1. everything should be implemented in the lowest place in a technology stack where it can, reasonably, be implemented
2. basic functionality should work in the lowest position in a technology stack where it can work at all

There are things one cannot implement without JS. Scrolling, responsive layouts, and basic interfaces (with some interactivity and even transition animations these days) are not such things.

@ruffni @swaggboi @claudiom infinityscroll belongs in a very special circle of hell, along with position:fixed auto-play videos.

Kill it with fire. Nuke it from the orbit. Weed it out and salt the ground.

@ruffni @swaggboi @claudiom and my personal favourite, an infinityscroll website with a footer that contains some important info or functionality (say, language toggle).

To all the devs that have ever implemented it (and there's plenty): what is wrong with you?

@rysiek Ugh...for some reason you can't even mark/highlight text that is in the bullet points.😬

you're unbeatable playing scrabble

triple score in this thread :-)
web design intern trying to show off depth of knowledge, displaying cluelessness in usability

@rysiek Holy shit, a complete .js Website that looks like plain HTML with some CSS, but loads like garbage.

@rysiek It is nice as an experimental, or as a show-off. But not as a website trying to be usable. JavaScript, man. JavaScript.

@rysiek Unreadable and dense, too. But that’s not necessarily because of the JavaScript.

@rysiek at least for me, this site is absolutely completely broken when trying to open in a private window on firefox-esr

This is a TERRIBLE look for something that calls itself "The Database for Freedom Fighters"

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon for Tech Folks

This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!