@jlhertel Have you been spying on my coding lately?...
(But seriously I need a Python debugger or something like that, now that I think about it. Using print and inspect.stack() is nice but it could be better)

@jlhertel gdb is reliable enough i'll end up taking the offramp

@jlhertel when the language you use doesn't have a decent standalone debugger

@jlhertel This is why I don't code. I have too much compassion for those after me who would surely have to immediately debug/refactor it. 😱

@jlhertel Pleased to see that i'm not the only one doing this :).

@jlhertel I drove both reads for one challenging issue I was tasked a while ago.

@jlhertel I don't even know what I can use as a python debugger on linux.

I think that pycharm supports it but it's extremely heavy and slows down my whole PC.

@jlhertel if it's installing visual studio or using printf, i'm using printf :')

@jlhertel the very best programmers I’ve met all use printf(), even for multithreaded apps.

@jlhertel
On the picture the *right* way is writing 10 `printf` statements ;)

@jlhertel

"The most effective debugging tool is still careful thought, coupled with judiciously placed print statements."

- Brian Kernighan

@sir
@jlhertel
Yep, I always feel cool because I can debug my OS using GDB, but some of the best best osdevers I know just stream tons of debug info to the serial port and carefully analyse its output

If you have a function whose affects can't be verbosely described in one print statement, it should be removed

@pounce @jlhertel I've often said that most of my life consists of reading text or figuring out why some text isn't the right text

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon for Tech Folks

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!