I wrote a super non-timely blog post on political alignments: (link: https://www.ianbicking.org/blog/2019/07/kling-axes-of-politics-technocrats.html) ianbicking.org/blog/2019/07/k… – somehow I feel bad writing about politics, but no current events are mentioned!
@ianbicking Oooh, heresy!
If you are lucky, you are going to be scolded for being a vile centrist. If you aren't, well, I will pray for you. 🙃
(Have you read "The Righteous Mind"?)
@ianbicking another common example: conservatives generally use "elites" to mean "people with education and/or culture", whereas liberals use the same word to mean "people with money and/or power". Surprising how many people (including people who supposedly understand these things for a living) are confused by this.
@ianbicking I think your theory collapses when you account for all the different political leanings out there:
- socialism (oppressor vs. oppressed)
- fascism/alt-right (glory vs. weakness?)
- left-libertarianism (freedom vs. coercion but also oppressor vs. oppressed)
- neoliberalism (efficiency vs. inefficiency)
@ianbicking Also, how do you define "progress"? Libertarians would define progress as "more liberty," communists would define progress as "more equality," neolibs would define progress as "higher GDP," etc.
@jwinnie Well this part is easy! This isn't about a rational value system, this is about the emotional cues that resonate.
What is progress? It matters a lot to me, because if you convince me that something is progress then I'll get excited about it.
And maybe that's something important: we're open to arguments about how we should apply our values. But if (for instance) you try to convince me that a particular group is the oppressed or the oppressor, I can agree and yet am unmoved.
@jwinnie Is there anything wrong with having a lot of them? Except that you need some critical mass that is able to construct and reinforce these ideas among themselves.
I suspect people have a dominant perspective, and the secondary perspective is much much weaker. So you only get as many dichotomies as there are distinct intellectual and cultural political groups.
@ianbicking So you think all of these ideas are subdivisions of "liberal," "conservative," "libertarian," and "technocratic"?
@jwinnie Not at all – the point is that there's no universal spectrum that applies to all these political identities. If you can convince enough people of a value system you can create a new political identity from scratch.
The outcomes of that value system might align with another value system. For instance, I think technocratic and liberal are closely aligned, with "progressive" maybe being the loose term to encompass both. But the reasons and emotional resonances are still distinct.
@ianbicking I understand your point now. This is a very interesting idea.
But I would change the terminology a bit. To me, "Liberal" is "progress vs. superstition" and "Leftist" is "oppressor vs. oppressed."
This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!