people talk about 'technical debt', but i think the word technical is a misnomer. 'innovation debt' or 'speed to market debt' make more sense. lots of this debt is created by business decisions that are not technical at all. this concept of debt caused by optimising for delivery is good, but its not constrained to just technology.

@fitz it is like any debt, you spend to do things like buy ice cream, have fun, buy computer etc, what you owe at the end is money. What you spent it one is not money. Technical debt to me means you did other stuff in the past mostly hoping that time to market would help with overall target, and now if you have technical debt you OWE technology steps to cover that to cover that expense. To me, the term fits from that perspective.

Follow

@Otuk i guess what i am trying to flag is that you could have a business that has no technology at all. and it will do things that are debt that has to be paid back, such a weak process, lack of employee onboarding etc.

business people often dont get 'technical debt'and i think its because its sounds like its a special thing - when infact its thr same as any decision where you choose speed to market (appropriate) over the 'correct' approach.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon for Tech Folks

This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!