rms addressed the free software community and the only thing he thinks he did wrong was defending Minsky.

No word about things he said, or the talks about how he dealt with FSF employees or anything else.

It's like he believes that people are angry for just that Minsky incident.

Also, I'm not in the mood to get into a discussion about if he's right or wrong, or accusations right or wrong.

It is that the whole thing feels... empty.

Now, I don't want to sound biased or anything, but the board message also feels empty: fsf.org/news/statement-of-fsf-

A few things give me the wrong impression of it all, specially the second paragraph.

For example "We decided to bring RMS back because we missed his wisdom". One thing is realize that you lack some sort of wisdom, another is "miss". It feels the response is purely emotional and not rational.

Another point: "His historical, legal and technical acumen on free software is unrivaled." As a tech leader/senior dev, my mission is to spread knowledge. If you have a senior/lead that keeps knowledge to themselves (or, worse, doesn't instill curiosity on searching for an answer), then, IMHO, they failed as senior/lead.

Honestly, I stopped reading at that point, 'cause, again, it feels like it was purely emotional decision and not based on technical things.

Follow

@juliobiason "Here are a bunch of things we didn't do because we realised that if we did them we would never be able to get away with doing what we wanted, so now we are pretending to apologise for not doing them."

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 1
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon for Tech Folks

This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!