I appreciate your covering the exchange between the author and Joy Lisi Rankin. I was looking at some of the things the fediverse's own @nasser had done and stumbled across Rankin's talk that so upset the author (it was the 1st of the session, I never got around to watching rest, my apologies to Ramsey Nasser!).
I think it's worth a watch
I'd seen PLATO mentioned in histories of online communities before (probably in Howard Rheingold's book) but those all seemed like technohagiographies of fusty old systems long gone whose users had all moved on. I was never really so interested in learning more about it until seeing Rankin's talk.
I should know better by now than to be surprised that a talk like that could draw such an awful, professionally costly negative response. I had no idea until your review that it had.
Yes. I don't agree entirely with Rankin's reading of the facts (and in other cases I don't think she's backed up her assertions sufficiently) but Dear's response was, at least in parts, vitriolic, triggering an entirely avoidable downwards spiral. The kind of work Rankin is doing is important to contextualize these historical communities and I hope we'll see more such scholarship.
do you mean in her talk? Or have you read her book, too?
if only the talk, it seems a repeat of one of Dear's errors, going hammer-and-tongs after a work-in-progress presentation.
I have the "People's History" book here as well, and it repeats some of those same assertions (happy to elaborate but not at toot length limits :).
But I certainly agree that Dear's aggressive response crossed several lines, which far overshadowed the substance of his arguments, such as it is.
This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!