Why are non-profits important for free software?
@conservancy I also have that question.
@conservancy Which type of non-profit are we talking about? 501c3 orgs are a little different from 501c6 orgs.
@conservancy I apologize if I am being too pedantic. I just wanted to be clear.
I agree with others in this thread, and I'll add my 2 cents.
For me, a 501c3 non-profit indicates a commitment and duty to a mission. If a free software project is organized as a 501c3 or is provided services from one (e.g. SFC), I generally feel more secure about the project's priorities and use of resources.
A 501c3 is also the only type of org I would be willing to assign copyright to.
@conservancy They give the opportunity to provide institutional protections to projects that would otherwise have to fend for themselves, in terms of accepting and holding assets.
Some entity needs to hold money, and sometimes other resources, in circumstances where doing so doesn't make sense for individuals.
@conservancy Because non-profits can be driven by *principles* ― not profit maximization 🤷
@conservancy Non-profits seem to me like a good way to pay people who do the "boring" parts of running a project: collecting donations, billing for work, dealing with legal issues, supporting users, paying for hosting and resources, arranging conferences. An umbrella org like the SFC might not do those things directly, but enables and helps a software project to get them done.
This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!
We adhere to an adapted version of the TootCat Code of Conduct and follow the Toot Café list of blocked instances. Ash is the admin and is supported by Fuzzface, Brian!, and Daniel Glus as moderators.
Hosting costs are largely covered by our generous supporters on Patreon – thanks for all the help!