Once go-fed gets off the ground I think it'd be great to revive ForgeFed and get federated code repositories back into discussion.
And yes before someone replies with the "git is already federated" blog post: that someone is missing the point, just like that article's author was when I debated with him in the ForgeFed archives. One day I'll write a strong rebuttal blog piece.
@cj I think that you're emphasising things in a way that the forgefed repo doesn't, and I bet that's what triggered Drew. If it's about federating the social aspect of repository contributions, ortogonal to what the underlying mechanism of source control does, I doubt that even he would have issues with the idea.
However I think that if forgefed wants to reimplement mechanisms that arguably the vcs does better - which is adding new iterations on top of a code repository - then it's plain wrong.
@mariusor I guess it depends on where you draw the line: GitHub pull requests and GitLab merge requests are exactly what you described as they are a layer on top of the VCS.
The email workflow in git is great for those who like that workflow. But GitHub's resounding adoption shows that in general developers vastly prefer a convenient, shiny, and functional UI layer.
I view such objections as "the Dropbox objection": no one is taking away rsync (git w/ email), just making it easier
This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!
We adhere to an adapted version of the TootCat Code of Conduct and follow the Toot Café list of blocked instances. Ash is the admin and is supported by Fuzzface, Brian!, and Daniel Glus as moderators.
Hosting costs are largely covered by our generous supporters on Patreon – thanks for all the help!