So I've been working on a #golang tool that will take in a JSON-LD RDF specification (like the #ActivityStreams one here :https://github.com/gobengo/activitystreams2-spec-scraped/blob/master/data/activitystreams-vocabulary/1528589057.json) and spit out generated Go code that automatically generates the static types for it.
The intent is, ActivityStreams extensions would be able to host this specification as their @context reference, people could use this tool to auto-generate the extension for their Go code, and then build their apps with it.
The biggest problem I am facing right now is that I am having to code into the tool the different RDF specifications:
So where things will get hairy is: I am lazy and don't want to implement all of them. :)
So "if" (I hope) or "when" ('cause life) a new vocabulary wants to use some esoteric RDF specification to do so, or parts of the above I haven't implemented yet, the tool will fail and the tool will need an update. Which stinks.
But at the end of the day, I want it to get to the point where if the Go code compiles, the app is guaranteed conforming to the vocabulary and extensions specification (the "data" part of #ActivityPub).
Then if the app happens to use the rest of the go-fed part for the actual AP behaviors, it comes with my Guarantee Seal of Approval (valued at one bagoozillitillion USD) that the "behavior" part is also to-spec. Unfortunately, a lot of that is run-time correctness.
This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!
We adhere to an adapted version of the TootCat Code of Conduct and follow the Toot Café list of blocked instances. Ash is the admin and is supported by Fuzzface, Brian!, and Daniel Glus as moderators.
Hosting costs are largely covered by our generous supporters on Patreon – thanks for all the help!