Insight gained from reading a paper titled "ACLs don't" that is really obvious in retrospect:
the confused deputy problem happens exactly because authority-based systems care about the authority of whoever directly performs an operation, and that intuition/model breaks when there's a *delegation*, i.e. with deputies.
It would be possible to deal with simple delegation, but it won't work when there are multiple levels of it or when there are complex delegation graphs.
This is beautiful and I've never thought about this before:
the convention we have in Unix to pass pre-opened stdin/stdout/stderr fds is not just a nice way to tell the program where to read its input from and output its result/logs to; it is exactly how capability passing should work in a capability-based system. This also is another reason why accepting an -o option (for "output file") is a bad idea.
Also, this is how socket activation works. systemd (or launchd, or inetd, or what have you) listens on a port or a Unix socket — because, being root, it has rights to. Then it passes a capability — either the bound socket fd, or an individual connection fd — when starting your service. Your service then doesn't have to be privileged, because it doesn't need to be able to open/bind the port/socket.
@bugaevc Got a link?
@ConnyDuck @Tusky copy a link from some other toot (in this case it was from https://mastodon.technology/@bugaevc/101952678770861956) by long-pressing on it and paste it into a new toot
This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either! We adhere to an adapted version of the TootCat Code of Conduct and have documented a list of blocked instances. Ash is the admin and is supported by Fuzzface, Brian!, and Daniel Glus as moderators. Hosting costs are largely covered by our generous supporters on Patreon – thanks for all the help!