New year, new good morning thread!

Good morning! Check out my dad’s table saw.

had a dream last night that I bought a midi controller at a thrift store, good morning

good morning, last night I continued watching Canada’s Worst Driver, descending further into the Andrew Younghusband Cinematic Universe

medical (~) 

this is the season where one of the nominees has an acquired brain injury, and they’re treating the subject with remarkable sensitivity. for television, anyway.

wait, does dressing up as a tin of sardines make Andrew a scalie? :thonk:

good morning, Siri doesn’t know how to pluralize temperature degrees because it’s written by damn Americans and their damn foolish Fahrenheit :dont_at_me:


good morning, Canada got a new food guide and it includes hydration, so make sure you're hydrated!


it also includes tips like "cook more often", mindful eating, and awareness of food advertising

I feel like that's a cool step forward. It'd be more cool of ol' JT would just reform food advertising.

oh, but for market forces!

Show newer

@ashfurrow I just checked this and it's true. Brackets change everything.

@adz @ashfurrow It does it without the brackets too! But so does Bing and DuckDuckGo.

@ashfurrow technically the minus sign is a multiplication with -1, therefore it could make sense that it has lower precedence than exponentiation.

Wolfram Alfa gives the same result (even for -3^2), and they are math guys.

@ytg @ashfurrow Precedence rules are PEMDAS:

So the calculator query shows "-(3 squared)" which is -9.

You have to type "(-3) squared" to get 9.

@cj @ytg it’s really a question of changing language into symbolic math; I think most people would say the answer should be 9, but language is always ambiguous. If I use a calculator and press the buttons “-“, “3”, and “x^2”, the answer is indeed 9.

@ashfurrow @cj @ytg
Not in whatever calculator I appear to have on Ubuntu. pressing '-', '3', and 'x^2' yields -9.

When I use parens around -3, I get 9.

@rcode3 @cj @ytg the iOS calculator app handles this properly, and iirc, my TI-83 did as well.

Again, this is all the ambiguity of language. There's no "correct" answer, but some answers are more correct than others.

@cj @ytg is it a multiplication by -1? I consider “-3” to be its own number unto itself. But again, language :)

@erAck “-3” isn’t an operation, it’s a number. And the ambiguity of the natural speech “negative three squared” is highlighted by the difference of “(negative three) squared” vs “negative (three squared)” - I would argue the first is _more_ correct.

@tapi @ashfurrow I would argue that the picture gives away too much information on your secret project.

And Dave looks up from YouTube and asks, what kind of containers are you using?

@ashfurrow I wonder if the formatting code is converting a number from °F but using the original number for the plural selection.

@ashfurrow I keep thinking that one day we're going to spot buildings that are designed to remind us of legos...


@ashfurrow I think I'll continue with the tried-and-true method of "buying a box of Kraft Dinner from Target" ;o)

(I'm in shape. Round's a shape.)

Show newer


@ashfurrow Open box, pour into water. Boil until tolerable. Devour orange substance. Return to other tasks.


@ashfurrow but where are the instructions for making it in my instant pot! Trudeau just half assing thing left and right

Show newer
Show newer
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon for Tech Folks

This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!