In the past I've slightly disparaged Mastodon/ActivityPub's data model & replication protocol, compared to aforementioned Dat, IPFS, Secure Scuttlebutt, BitTorrent DHT, et al., but have concluded that, for me and some friends (small N), Mastodon has succeeded tremendously in providing a home where I don't have to worry about "the rando problem" that substack is struggling with:
https://viewer.scuttlebot.io/%25OkgDsogCxesWEWn77Znu2alWlqNTpZVgRI4AWxcckBc%3D.sha256
Alanna is basically describing a well-run Mastodon instance here: https://viewer.scuttlebot.io/%25bM6TrtRhduWNQcm%2BfOsgHpzcp%2F0olJjgqo3l14FM4GM%3D.sha256
'Randos with "ideas" constantly swoop into channels such as feminism with poorly researched theories for all to see, including new people who will be put off the community for good.' —substack
'At this point in my life, I have no interest being subjected to BS. … I don't give a shit if I end up a complete no-asshole filter bubble. Sounds great to me. There are plenty of ideas to share and work to collaborate on with non-assholes.' —Alanna
And that concludes this edition of #SSB Internet Drama.
@22 those bums are so annoying. I dont understand why ssb doesn’t have “friend only” privacy settings for posts... even diaspora has that shit
@XavierJulep Hmm, you could encrypt messages with the public keys of your friends, which would be pretty easy to do client-side (like most things on SSB).
@22 yeah i was thinking 1 key pair shared among friends as a 'group key'. Like if I sent you my private key
