Might seriously get into nethack.

Also would be a great test for dd-dos (when it'll work).


@dd86k Well, Nethack on *16-bit* DOS.

I'll bet that it still compiles with DJGPP at least, since DJGPP tries to provide as much POSIX as is reasonable under that platform.

@SuperFloppies I'm thinking it's dropping support for REAL-MODE? Or just 8086? Dunno about extensions.
I can always get older versions and compile that lol

@dd86k I'm guessing they want to get rid of all the 16-bit specific crap, like all the seriously broken memory handling.

At least for me, the code that I (very) occasionally maintain for real mode DOS requires the use of OpenWatcom. DOS is pretty easy to support, though, if you stay within the confines of what GCC will offer in its DJGPP port.

The only thing that really is missing there is the ability to access physmem with linear addresses. Seems like 32-bit Watcom C can do this, but DJGPP cannot.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon for Tech Folks

This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either!

We adhere to an adapted version of the TootCat Code of Conduct and follow the Toot Café list of blocked instances. Ash is the admin and is supported by Fuzzface as a moderator.

Hosting costs are largely covered by our generous supporters on Patreon – thanks for all the help!