Commutes are free for employers. If those 2 hours lost on the road would be paid, remote work would have been the standard since the 90's.
@MikeVeerman I never understood, how this is possible - just say you want a handy man to come over and fix your what-ever - there /always/ will be the way to you on the bill, but not so for the handy-man if they have some way from home to work. Such utter non-sense.
@MikeVeerman Only for job where remote work is an option though.
That's the majority of office jobs, no?
@MikeVeerman Well, any office jobs implying frontoffice in contact with clients (or like in my librarian case patrons) needs a physical presence for at least part of the task to be done, and that’s only the first thing I can think of.
Also, I wouldn’t be sure that office jobs are the majority of jobs either.
(Oh, btw I don’t know where you are, but here commutes aren’t really free for employers, they do give something for commuting in various ways depending on how you commute.)
@MikeVeerman Funny thing is for a CSR position or similar, tracking performance is straightforward, and work from home is significantly cheaper for the employer. Yet many private and public agencies still run call centers 🤑
Management's incompetence encourages this, most orgs are still stuck in the butt in seat mindset, whereby if someone isn't punching a clock and being managed like a small child, the manager feels useless. Really just costs the employer overall, offices ain't cheap!
@MikeVeerman But people commute 2 hours a day because they can't afford to live within walking distance. Presumably local housing costs are reflected in salaries so indirectly the employer pays.
@edavies It's not about who pays. It's about the absurdity of losing the best hours of your day getting to an open office where you block out your "colleagues" with headphones.
@MikeVeerman if you move house should the employer pay more? What’s your alternative?
@dch remote is the alternative.
@MikeVeerman or employers would have taken only people living close to the company
@SallyStrange @DarckCrystale @MikeVeerman I mean, I see where you're coming from, but this makes me think of when companies build their own living space and pay for their new employees to move there and thus are both their employers and their landlords... Add in a cafeteria (or decades ago, probably a grocers) run by The Company in a convenient location and voila, you have your employees entirely dependent on you.
As long as we have companies that aren't under control of the workers this will always be a problem. But if we have to choose between companies that externalize the cost of transporting workers from home to job site or those that compensate workers for that time somehow, whether via direct payment for travel or investment in nearby living situations, I guess I'd pick the latter.
You don't seem particularly sorry, nor particularly interested in examining the set of issues at play here from any perspective except "how does this affect me personally"
There's nothing wrong with considering that but if it's the only perspective you have then it limits how interesting any conversation with you can be. Yep, as a worker it sucks to move. As a worker, lots of things fucken suck.
This is definitely a valid worry because it was the business status quo for quite a while in industrializing America, more so if you count feudalism as basically a fancy hereditary form of this.
They started to issue their own currency that couldn't be used outside of their own company stores.
How did I never thought of that?!
I think it would be a valid strategy to fight for employers to reimburse commute.
BTW when France still had many industries, the big companies had their own bus to come pick up/drop off employees
@freyja_wildes Or to switch to remote work where possible. If all the office workers are taken out of the equation, nurses don't have traffic jams.
i actually spend 2 hours on my commute every day, and if i was paid for those at the same rate, o would have no problem with it.
instead it's hell.
@MikeVeerman There'd be major differences in Urban planning too
Absolutely! Imagine the possibilities...
@MikeVeerman see XAVIER WRONA Architect in Chicago - Paris ... www.MostlyVideo.WORK .. click Urban System x Geographies .. scroll to AFTER THE REVOLUTION ... 1love keep up good works
@MikeVeerman if you have a 2hr commute (even 30min iirc) you get tax deductible in Sweden. Pretty rad.
You get it no matter if you take your own car or public transport, or bike!
@MikeVeerman And companies that need presence would have been more enthusiastic about job-swapping to minimize commutes.
Can't find it, but there have been programs that made a database of (say) all the 7-11s in a region, and let workers register for which locations were good commutes for them, and would notify pairs of workers who could swap jobs to mutual benefit. I believe the cities ran them to reduce traffic; the companies grudgingly admitted that they lost nothing and gained less-tired employees.
This Mastodon instance is for people interested in technology. Discussions aren't limited to technology, because tech folks shouldn't be limited to technology either! We adhere to an adapted version of the TootCat Code of Conduct and follow the Toot Café list of blocked instances. Ash is the admin and is supported by Fuzzface, Brian!, and Daniel Glus as moderators. Hosting costs are largely covered by our generous supporters on Patreon – thanks for all the help!