@Lofenyy @downey #FOSS is free labor for everyone and everybody can use it. This includes companys. But #OpenSource Software is also for the people to set them free. Some tech companies are using the free labor for the people to get them into their proprietary services to restrict the freedom of the people and to profit from this restriction. These companies are using free labor for Open Source and for the people to achieve the opposite.
@datenteiler @downey This is where the GPL comes in. If you modify and redistribute the software, the license must remain, which means the source code must be released to. This is a huge deal when it comes to Android phones. It allows us to actually have a sliver of hope when trying to understand the devices because the drivers are part of the kernel source tree, which is GPL.
@nifker @downey However, in the software world, where once info is modified, it can be relicensed at will. This means that if a peice of software requires spurce code distribution but allows relicensing, a big company can come along, duplicate the work, extend it with features and antifeatures and publish it without the source code and a new license. This is far from ideal and harms people.
@nifker @downey This is where copyleft comes in. Copyleft is one small restriction which states that code cannot be relicensed. It must retain the same license it was distributed with. This restriction prevents the previous issue from occouring and modifications to software by any entity can be added or rejected by the community, making it by far the gold standard of software licensing. This benefits everyone in the long run.
The main thing is the copyleft nature. A long time ago, we very quickly discovered that once info was either a public domain dedication or was licenced with an unrestricted license, it could benefit everyone.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!